Yes, Virginia, there is a Hatchet Man: Meet “Jew Hunter” Fred Malek

by SunnyJane

McDonnell with Pat Robertson

By virtue of the authority vested in him as Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia under Article V of the Constitution of Virginia and under the laws of the Commonwealth…blah, blah, blah… and subject always to his continuing and ultimate authority and responsibility to act in such matters, Bob McDonnell thereby established the Governor’s Commission on Government Reform and Restructuring – from here on out referred to as the “Commission.”

Oooookay then!  If you need a quick translation, Virginia’s governor is going to live up to his right-wing conservative creds and “make government smaller.”  Isn’t that what ALL right-wing conservative politicians have a hankering to do?

This new Commission will Identify opportunities… Explore innovative ways…Seek out means…and, of course, Examine ways…

This has to be done, you see, because Virginia “faces unprecedented budgetary challenges and increasing demands for core public services.  Citizens and businesses residing in Virginia are entitled to a limited and effective state government.”  There!  See?  We citizens of the Commonwealth are entitled to…oh, never mind.

On the surface, this sounds like a fine idea.  Who would not be up for effective state government?  But…limited?  It’s according to how the goal of limited is achieved.  Which brings us to the issue of who’s running the show, er, Commission.

There was an audible and collective gasp from the Commonwealth’s citizenry when Gov. McDonnell announced that Fred Malek, the seventy-three-year-old Republican powerbroker and so-so businessman of dubious reputation was chosen to head up the trimming-down of the Virginia government’s organization chart.

Sure, he’s Sarah Palin’s “Now, Fred, tell me if I’m for this or against this,” course-of-action guru.  And, yeah, he swindled money from senior citizens and bribed the Connecticut state treasurer by throwing investment business his way.  But, hey, if Virginia House Speaker William J. Howell (R-Stafford) huffs indignantly that, “This man is eminently qualified to head up this commission,” who are we to question the judgment of the governor’s appointment?

I’ll tell you who we are.  We are the citizens of this Commonwealth, and not only do we have a right, we have an obligation to speculate on the motive behind appointing a person who has a history of surreptitiously identifying, relocating to less significant jobs, or removing minority government workers to satisfy the paranoia of their boss – whoever that boss may be.

Malek served in Richard Nixon’s administration in several different roles, including Deputy Under Secretary of Department of Health, Education, and Welfare under Secretary Robert Finch, as special assistant from 1970 to 1973.

Colson

In 1971, Richard Nixon became convinced the Bureau of Labor Statistics had come under the control of Democratic rivals and what Nixon termed a Jewish cabal. He instructed aides Charles Colson and H. R. Haldeman to identify a list of Democrats and important Jewish officials at the agency.  Haldeman then tapped Fred Malek to carry out this appalling task.

When queried about this, Malek responds, “I refused four times. The fifth time he came back and gave me a direct order through Haldeman, so I gave him a number. I regret my compliance. It was a mistake.”  It appears from documents released some years afterwards, however, that Malek may have been sugar-coating his reluctance and subsequent “regret.”

Two memos written between July 27 and September 8, 1971, show that Malek had been a busy guy.

In a July 27, 1971, memo to H. R. Haldeman which had as its subject Bureau of Labor Statistics, Malek wrote:

This memo is in response to your request for a demographic breakdown on BLS employees.  We were able to obtain political affiliation checks on 35 of the 50 names listed on their organization chart.  The breakdown on these is as follows:

Republicans                                       1

Democrats                                       25

Independents or Unknown                    4

Not Registered                                  5

_________________________

TOTAL                                             35

In addition, 13 out of the 35 fit the other demographic criterion that was discussed. (Someone, presumably Haldeman, underlined this paragraph and added a handwritten note that read, “Most of these are at the top.”)

Of course, the other demographic criterion referred to in Malek’s memo was “Jewish.”

Six weeks later, on September 8, 1971, Malek wrote again to Haldeman on the same subject: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The purpose of this memo is to update you on the progress in strengthening the BLS.  After gaining agreement from (White House budget director George) Shultz and (Special Counsel to the president Charles) Colson on a general approach, I had several meetings with Secretary Hodgson to convince him on the need for fairly drastic moves.  This was followed up by action sessions with Under Secretary (of Labor, Lawrence H.) Silberman and Assistant Secretary (of Labor Frank) Zarb.  The following actions have been agreed to and are now being implemented:

–The BLS will be organized with 6 out of 9 existing offices being combined into a newly created Office of Data Analysis headed by a second Deputy Commissioner.  This new office contains all the sensitive analytical and interpretive responsibilities of the Bureau.  Before and after charts are shown at Tab A.  The new organization will take effect as soon as the new Deputy Commissioner is selected.

–A politically sensitive, loyal Republican economist will be selected for the new Deputy post.  John Clarke of my staff is now identifying possible candidates.  This should be finalized by the end of the month.

–Harold Goldstein will be moved to a routine, non-sensitive post in another part of BLS.  He has been told of this and will move quietly when the reorganization is announced.

–A sensitive and loyal Republican is also being recruited for the employment analysis function being vacated by Goldstein.

–Peter Henle, Associate Commissioner for Economic and Social Research, and Leon Greenberg, Associate Commissioner for Statistical Standards and Operations, will be transferred when the reorganization is announced.

We have decided not to replace (Geoffrey H.) Moore  as Commissioner because of his technical competence, apparent willingness to cooperate, and strong ties to (Chairman of the Federal Reserve System) Arthur Burns.  This decision is based on the combined recommendations of Schultz, Hodgson, and Colson.  Also, you will note that instead of replacing (Ben) Burdetsky as Deputy Commissioner, the plan creates a second Deputy over the most critical areas.  This is a compromise, but I believe it is a workable solution.

The search for the new Deputy has the highest priority, and I am aiming for a selection in 3 weeks.  Thus, by the end of the month Secretary Hodgson should be announcing the reorganization, announcing the new Deputy appointment, and effecting the transfers of Goldstein, Henle, and Greenberg.  These moves do not go as far as I would have preferred but represent a reasonable compromise that I feel will make the BLS a more responsive and effective unit. (Emphasis added)

Attachment

cc: Chuck Colson

(Timothy Noah, at Slate.com has an excellent and thorough write-up on this subject)

(As a means of justifying Malek’s actions to ferret out the Democrats and/or Jews in the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, it has been stated with some indignation by his supporters that one cannot refuse a direct order from the president.  Oh, really?  Lest we forget, that is exactly what Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus did on October 20, 1973, when Nixon ordered first Richardson and then Ruckelshaus to fire special prosecutor Archibald Cox during the Watergate scandal.  Both men resigned rather than carry out the president’s order, and Robert Bork then reluctantly fired Cox.  This entire incident went down in the annals of history as the Saturday Night Massacre.)

Nixon must have been very pleased with the outcome of Fred Malek’s cooperation in the Jewish Cabal caper because Malek served as deputy chief of the Committee to Re-elect the President in 1972.  In his memoirs, Nixon described Malek as a “tough young businessman whose specialty was organization and management.”

Frequently overlooked is exactly how Malek went about his organization and management tasks for the disgraced president.  Well, in the first Nixon administration (remember that this is when he was hunting Jews), Malek designed and directed the “Responsiveness Program,” a strategy to replace civil servants with Nixon supporters and to steer government resources to benefit Nixon’s 1972 re-election.  According to the Senate Watergate report, Malek wrote in a 1972 memo to Haldeman that someone was needed to “take the lead in the program to politicize Departments and Agencies” and to “supervise the patronage operation and closely monitor the grantmanship operation.”  In advocating the plan, Malek wrote of “substantial risks” to politicizing the Executive Branch and expressed concern that the plan would “undoubtedly backfire” if made public; therefore he recommended that “to minimize any links to the President, there should be no directions on this project in writing.”

Hmmm…

While Malek obviously prefers to keep his religious affiliation confidential, he was an acolyte of JW Marriott’s, being his number two person (president of Marriott Hotels) for some years.  Marriott was a devout member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, and his corporate style is said to have had a decidedly “Mormon culture,” which translates as a far-right-wing conservative Christian culture.  When Malek joined the Carlyle Group, a privately held organization calling its industry “financial services” made up of conservative politicians and businessmen, he brought with him Dan Altobello, Steve Norris, Fred Malek and Dan D’Aniello, all of whom where Marriott executives.  (See an excerpt from The Iron Triangle: Inside the Secret World of the Carlyle Group, by Dan Briody).

Liberty University NOT for Free Thinkers

When questioned on the appropriateness of his choice to lead the Reform and Restructuring Commission, Gov. McDonnell claims not to have had any knowledge of Malek’s BLS, SEC or other dubious actions, which seems to indicate he is either lying or is woefully uninformed regarding the backgrounds of those he appoints to do the work of the Commonwealth.  The latter hypothesis is highly unlikely.

It is apparent that the new governor intends to staff the Virginia’s government offices with people who are as far-right-wing Christian conservative as he is.  And how he achieves his reform and restructuring goal needs watching – very carefully.

In a subsequent post, some of the actions and appointments Gov. McDonnell has made during his first five months in office will be examined.  These turn out to be highly interesting and wholly consistent with his “values.”  And not particularly good for the Commonwealth of Virginia in the early days of the twenty-first century.

Thank you SunnyJane! We look forward to these subsequent posts, and this is a good opportunity to point out that even though this is occurring in Virginia – do not assume that it has no relevance to you no matter where you live in America. What SunnyJane has written about here is insight to what is transpiring from state-to-state. These seemingly innocuous appointments. The Boards and Commissions that evade our radar screens as they do “business as usual”.

This is all part of a broader picture, where we take so little notice in what is happening that they do what they want. I don’t know when the murmured mantra, “I don’t get involved! They are all corrupt!” became an accepted response to any notion of political awareness in this country. But it is precisely this notion of apathy and unwillingness to pay attention by progressives and conservatives that has allowed for an environment ripe for the take over by Christian values extremists and corporate plutocrats.

For any of you out there who are noticing, as SunnyJane did, Political Dominionism at work in your state…please write to me and we would all appreciate hearing from you!

Rebiblican Party logo (c)2009

We are going forth with the term “Rebiblican” from now on when we refer to Political Domionist candidates. This is not limited to those who run as republicans. There are rebiblicans who run as democrats, independents, libertarian and even as in the case recently of Doug Hoffman in NY 23 – as a conservative party candidate. Though most closely associated with republicans, they are political chameleons who hold no allegiance other than to their Political Dominionist dogma.

In the world of Political Dominionism, they like to view themselves as “going stealth”, although they openly advocate running their candidates under ANY party flag just so long as they win. They rely on the general populace paying attention to surface level politicking, and not really going deeper into the background and true ideologies of the candidates.

In Hoffman’s case this wasn’t so, given that he clearly aligned himself to the hard right and looney teabaggers agenda. In Seattle, Washington a Rebiblican candidate named Susan Hutchison was trickier for most to identify…and with good reason. 1) as a general rule as I said above, most voters do not truly dig into the identity of the candidate and will often take the surface rhetoric as sufficient information to base their votes on; 2) Hutchison worked to craft a change in the status of that elected position in the past to make it a non-partisan post, thereby allowing a candidate (namely her in this case) to run as a “moderate” and not be pinned down by specifics.

The great news? She lost…and lost by a wide margin…58% t0 42%, and that was after leading in the polls a week prior to the election. It took an all out effort by several of us to write about who this Rebiblican candidate is and what her real beliefs are on social issues. The resulting victory for her opponent shows without question that the majority of us do NOT want Rebiblicans in office who will legislate their version of ‘c’hristian values and morality. This is a victory…and we need to view as a confirmation that we are doing something right.

She is in reality as “moderate” as Virginia Rebiblican Bob McDonnell, who won his bid for the governor’s office. Contrary to the brain-dead reporting by mainstream media sources on both sides, McDonnell won more because the democratic candidate was a weak candidate, and McDonnell put out enough propaganda that he is a “moderate” that people bought it. This guy is a textbook example of a Rebiblican!

Even the so-called liberal media outlets are spewing pundit rhetoric about how this was a show of strength for the GOP and a threat to the democrats. Excuse me? Why? Because of two governors races? I beg to differ! Case in point…this excerpt from the Washington Post….

Contests Serve as Warning to Democrats: It’s Not 2008 Anymore

Washington Post Nov. 4th, 2009

“Tuesday’s elections provided the first tangible evidence that Republicans can win their support with the right kind of candidates and the right messages. That is an ominous development for Democrats if it continues unabated into next year. But Republicans could squander that opportunity if they demand candidates who are too conservative to appeal to the middle.” ~ Dan Balz

With help like this from the liberal media…well you know the end of that statement. I am simply saying that contrary to the “sky-is-falling” entertainment version of the news, democrats fared far better than the Rebiblicans from coast to coast. So why the sensationalism and exaggerated reporting? Did it really go unnoticed that we gained seats in Congress?

I have to force myself to watch the punditry on CNN with as much angst as I do to listen to Fox. It appears that there is zero obligation to actually tell the truth, rather it is pure entertainment and the rules are – that there are no rules. It is pure self-adulation by the mutual admiration society by pseudo-celebrities who masquerade as news reporters.

This is serious. We have to take it seriously. We have to use our brains and not take the lazy way out. We really have to second question just who these people are and who their backers are, where they are springing up from, and ask the tough questions. If we don’t we will lose the majority in 2010.

There will be many antics cropping up as we edge closer and closer to the 2010 elections. And do NOT overlook your local elections. They often get overlooked because campaigns for school board, city seats and county elections just don’t hold the same intrigue as state and federal office. They just lack that sex appeal that garners a closer look, but I assure you this is where a lot of this gets started and then festers.

We want to spread the word far and wide - Rebiblican - so please use it as often as possible, because that is who they are. Let’s help the secular Republicans reclaim their Party and get back to discourse without personal attacks and bible-thumping!